Match your resume to any job offer

Applying without comparing your resume to the job's requirements is leaving things to chance. A resume ⚔️ job offer analysis reveals in seconds the actual compatibility score between your profile and the role, the key missing skills, the keywords absent from your resume that will block your application in ATS filters, and the strengths to highlight in your cover letter.

According to Harvard Business Review, candidates whose resumes align with at least 70% of a posting's requirements are 4 times more likely to be called for an interview. Yet the vast majority of applications are sent without prior tailoring. Comparing your resume to the target role lets you pinpoint exactly the priority adjustments to make, without rewriting your resume from scratch.

Recruiters spend an average of 7 seconds on a resume at first screening. ATS systems analyze keyword density and document structure before a human ever reads your application. A compatibility analysis identifies the required technical skills your resume doesn't mention, the experiences to rephrase to match the job's vocabulary, and the sections to reorganize to maximize your ATS score for that specific role.

Our resume ⚔️ job offer analysis tool processes both documents in under 30 seconds. It calculates an overall compatibility score, lists missing skills, estimates the salary range for the role, and generates concrete recommendations to tailor your application, no registration required. Each targeted application significantly increases your chances of making it to the next stage.

A match score measures the fit between one specific resume and one specific advert, as a percentage. It answers a narrower question than a resume analysis: not "is this resume good", but "does this candidate fit this role".

The difference is not cosmetic — it changes the weighting. In our standalone resume analysis, experience counts for more than skills. Here the two count equally: against an advert, a required skill you lack costs exactly what insufficient experience costs.

The methodological point that sets this score apart: a criterion the advert does not mention is never scored. For every criterion it grades, our analysis must quote the passage of the advert that imposes the requirement, word for word. The quote is then searched for in the advert's text, and a score whose quote cannot be found is discarded.

That constraint exists for a measured reason: without it, a model will happily grade the driving licence or the academic results of an advert that mentions neither, dropping the affected sections by tens of points. A section the advert is silent about from end to end comes back as not assessed, not as a zero.